DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Arayaselassie, Hanna | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-22T09:11:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-22T09:11:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014-09 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/957 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The standard of proof plays a vital role in the process of administration of
justice. In criminal proceedings, the standard stipulates the degree to which the
party who has the burden of proof needs to establish the facts constituting the
elements of the crime. This article gives an overview of the meaning and scope
of the ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ standard and subsequently argues that this
standard is adopted in the Ethiopian legal system although it is nowhere clearly
stated. It discusses the normative legal framework from which this standard can
be inferred. It then explores the practice of the Federal Supreme Court
Cassation Division by summarizing and analyzing cases most pertinent to the
issue of standard of proof. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | St. Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Standard of proof, beyond reasonable doubt, criminal proceedings, Ethiopia | en_US |
dc.title | Vol 8. No 1 The Standard of Proof in Criminal Proceedings: the Threshold to Prove Guilt under Ethiopian Law | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|