DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Hegena, Ayele | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-22T08:56:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-22T08:56:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-12 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/931 | - |
dc.description.abstract | With growing concerns regarding natural resources security over the last fifty
years, a range of movements, including the notion of the tragedy of the
commons suggest how to enhance sustainability of natural resources. A case in
point is the discourse on the necessity of introducing regulatory and market
schemes for the challenges to the sustainability of the commons. This article,
inter alia, highlights the literature on the tragedy of the commons, in order to
understand its theoretical and practical strengths, and examine the applicability
of its core ideas to current issues of water security. As contemporary water
security problems are interconnected and complex, the article challenges the
adequacy and effectiveness of coercive regulatory arrangements to individual
water users’ behavior in sustaining water security. It also examines the
variation of new initiatives (in natural resources management) from the
traditional perspectives of the tragedy of the commons. It is argued that
introducing coercive regulatory institutional arrangements is not by itself
sufficient because water security may require comprehensive regulatory and
non-regulatory institutional arrangements at national and transnational levels
(supplemented by comprehensive implementation strategies) to address a range
of water pressures. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | St. Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Tragedy of the Commons, the Commons, open- access, institutional arrangements, water security, water pressures | en_US |
dc.title | Vol 7. No 2 The Myth of ‘Tragedy of the Commons’ in Sustaining Water Resources | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|