Skip navigation
st. Mary's University Institutional Repository St. Mary's University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6953
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBayeligne, Tihut-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T06:49:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-29T06:49:20Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-
dc.identifier.uri.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6953-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to assess monitoring and evaluation performance of ASER construction aiming to determine whether progress could be made for meeting the objectives and goal of the organization. Literature about planning, monitoring and evaluation was reviewed. The study used a quantitative and qualitative mixed approach to explore the influence in detail. The primary data was collected from interview, questioner. Purposive sampling technique is used to determine sample, and as a result the sample size was 33 and the targeted population of this study were the staff the project managers and project coordinator. After collecting adequate information, data table presentation was used for analysis generated with Excel Microsoft. The research engaged tables, frequency, percentage approaches and excel Microsoft software. Concerning planning of M & E, there are good practices of M&E but the absence of monitoring and evaluation is seen. Regarding monitoring tools, Physical progress monitoring technical monitoring and quality monitoring are applied on projects but assumption monitoring is not applied on projects. Concerning techniques of evaluation, the performance indicator used was only formative evaluation as the M&E tools and techniques applied. Regarding to information, any information are provided to the project managers directly and the data are needed for decision making. Regarding M&E training is not continuously given to the staff during the gathering and reporting period of the system is also a problem. Therefore, the firm should prepare a framework and guidelines for the M&E system. Hence resulting in the neglect and the less attention given to the monitoring and evaluation of the entire project implementation process leads to unorganized system which focuses on employee to ensure the successful completion of projects.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherST. MARY’S UNIVERSITYen_US
dc.subjectConstruction Industry, monitoring and evaluation, monitoring on construction projects, performanceen_US
dc.titleASSESMENT OF MONITORING AND EVALUATINON IN THE CASE OF ASER CONSTRUCTIONen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Project Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tihut Bayeligne.pdf686.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.