DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Kiros, Simeneh | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-13T12:42:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-13T12:42:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v15i1.10 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The National Election Board of Ethiopia (NEBE) had rejected the request to
enable ethnic-Hararis who reside outside Harari Regional State to vote in the
election of Harari National Council members. The Board stated that it is not
bound by prior practices that do not have constitutional foundation. The Board
further noted that accepting such demand would jeopardize the fairness and
impartiality of the Board against other minority ethnic groups whose members
reside outside their national state. NEBE argued that article 50(2) of the Harari
Constitution contradicts the provision of article 50(3) of the FDRE
Constitution. However, based on the Harari National Council’s petition to the
Federal Supreme Court, the decision of NEBE has been reversed, and this has
been further affirmed by the FSC Cassation Division. This comment examines
the legal foundation and propriety of the decisions of the Federal Supreme
Court and the FSC Cassation Division. Inter alia, the FSC Cassation Division
has misinterpreted a provision under article 50(2) of the Harari Regional State
Constitution that expressly refers to the right to be candidate in elections at
place of birth as opposed to voting rights irrespective of residence. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | St.Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Equality of votes . Gerrymandering . Preferential treatment . Harari Regional State | en_US |
dc.title | Vol. 15 No.1:Legitimizing Gerrymandering in the Harari Regional State Contrary to the Principle of Equality of Votes | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|