DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Elias, Tessema | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-13T11:41:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-13T11:41:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v14i2.3 | - |
dc.description.abstract | EU plays a dominant role in international maritime governance, and it has
comprehensive maritime policies and strategies that have implications for third
States. On the other hand, developing landlocked States (LLS) have the lowest
bargaining power in the international maritime arena owing to their economic
and geographic position. This article examines the implications of the EU
maritime policy for developing LLS. After analysis of primary and secondary
data as well as empirical evidence from Ethiopia, it is argued that the EU
maritime governance such as its port State control regime and maritime market
access regulations could possibly make international maritime trade through the
EU waters as well as global maritime trade unaffordable for developing LLS. In
view of the inherent challenges encountered by developing LLS and the
economic interest of these States, it is submitted that there is a need to accord
differential treatment schemes in the maritime field to these States at global and
at the EU level. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | St.Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | EU Maritime Policy · Developing Landlocked States · UNCLOS · Port State Control · EU Maritime Regulations · | en_US |
dc.title | Vol. 14 No.2:The EU Maritime Regime and Challenges for Landlocked Developing States: Evidence from Ethiopia | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|