| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Kiros, Simeneh | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-13T11:36:35Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-12-13T11:36:35Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-11 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v14i2.1 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The state adopts criminal rules and punishment in order to achieve various state
ends. There is very little agreement regarding the content of ‘good criminal
law’. However, there is a general agreement regarding ‘good’ criminal
lawmaking process. This article argues that the lawmaking process may be used
to evaluate the legitimacy of the criminalisation process. Thus, it discusses prelegislation,
legislation and post-legislation phase duties of the legislature and
finds that these processes were not complied with in various Ethiopian laws that
contain penal provisions. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | St.Mary's University | en_US |
| dc.subject | Legisprudence · Criminal law · Criminal lawmaking · Law and politics · Legislation rules | en_US |
| dc.title | Vol. 14 No.2:Legisprudential Evaluation of Ethiopian Criminal Law-Making | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|
