Skip navigation
st. Mary's University Institutional Repository St. Mary's University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6610
Title: Vol. 14 No.1:The Preliminary Inquiry in Ethiopia and Its Adverse Impact on the Rights of the Accused
Authors: Demissie, Wondwossen
Keywords: Preliminary inquiry · Equality of arms · The right to confrontation · Fair trial· Office of the Attorney General
Issue Date: Sep-2020
Publisher: St.Mary's University
Abstract: Whether preliminary inquiry should be conducted following completion of criminal investigation was one of the issues that arose in criminal proceedings of leaders of some opposition parties who were arrested (in June and July 2020) following the assassination of Hachalu Hundessa. The Court accepted the request of the Office of the Attorney General for the holding of preliminary inquiry. While the request of the Office of the Attorney General and the ruling of the court are consistent with the 1961 Criminal Procedure Code, in view of the unique nature of the Ethiopian Preliminary Inquiry, both the request and the ruling adversely affect the right of the accused to a fair trial. The application of the law regulating preliminary inquiry would be a departure from the principle of equality of arms and the right of the accused to confrontation, both of which are elements of the right to a fair trial. It is argued (in this comment) that using evidence obtained during preliminary inquiry against the accused is inconsistent with the FDRE Constitution and relevant international legal instruments.
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v14i1.6
Appears in Collections:Mizan Law Review

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mizan LR_14(1) _Sept_2020-156-168.pdf405.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.