DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Mohammed, Abdulkader | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-13T06:16:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-13T06:16:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-09 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v12i1.3 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Given that patent law emerged in domestic systems, there was an obvious diversity
of patent regimes. With the advent of cross-border movement of resources,
including inventions, there was a need for a harmonized patent regime. The issue
went to another level with the entry into force of the WTO/TRIPS Agreement,
which requires WTO members to enact new patent laws or amend existing ones to
make them TRIPS compliant. The Ethiopian Patent Law, which was enacted in
1995, is strangely TRIPS compliant, tempting many to think that it had Ethiopia‟s
forthcoming accession in mind. However, with Ethiopia yet to complete the
accession process, there are further pressures from industrialized countries to ensure
that stringent patent rules are complied with in developing countries. This article
examines TRIPS, the Cotonou Agreement and AGOA as effective instruments of
ensuring compliance. It is argued that the Ethiopian patent system will continue to
observe TRIPS and other standards as dictated by the Global North. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | St.Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Globalization · Harmonization · IP · Patent · TRIPS Agreement · BTA · GSP · Cotonou Agreement · AGOA | en_US |
dc.title | Vol. 12 No.1:Globalization of Patent Laws through Trade Agreements, and Pressures on Ethiopia’s Patent Regime: The Passenger behind the Wheel | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|