DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Wondim, Tameru | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-11T06:42:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-11T06:42:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-09 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v11i1.8 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The art of arguing cases evolved in Ethiopia as elsewhere as a personal skill and
to this day, legal service in Ethiopia is a sole practice that has not been able to
organize itself into a law firm1. Lawyers have not been able to take advantage of
partnership models under the Ethiopian Commercial Code of 1960 as in other
countries, either because of concocted legal mysticism or because of the laxity of
legal service in the country that did not call for robust or specialized and
organized law firms. The history of law firms in other countries indicates that the
evolution proceeded through the General Partnership to Limited Partnership (LP)
and finally culminating on the Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) which started
in the USA and spread out to the rest of the world in the 1990s. It is now time to
think in terms of organizing law firms in Ethiopia, and the Committee entrusted
with a duty to revamp the Commercial Code of Ethiopia must see to it that the
section on Business Organizations included the LLP to accommodate
professional business associations including the legal practice. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | St.Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Legal practice, limited liability partnership, non-commercial professional partnership, Commercial Code, Ethiopia | en_US |
dc.title | Vol. 11 No.1:Some Thoughts on the Organization of Legal Practice in Ethiopia | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|