DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Adimi, Asress | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-11T06:37:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-11T06:37:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-09 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v11i1.6 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Various countries have reformed their secured transaction laws recognizing the
significance of modern secured transactions law in enhancing access to credit
and economic development. Ethiopia has not undertaken comprehensive
secured transactions law reform, despite the demonstrable mismatch between
the legal regime governing security interests and the country’s current political,
economic and commercial realities. In-depth analysis of the Ethiopian secured
transactions law is made in this article in the light of UCC1 Art 9, English, and
French secured transactions laws and the EBRD (European Bank for
Reconstruction and Development) Model law and the experience of civil
law jurisdiction of Louisiana. I argue that secured transaction law reform in
Ethiopia can be implemented based on UCC Art. 9 with some adjustment in
light of Louisiana’s experience. The article uses the unitary concept of security
interest and floating lien to exemplify the supremacy of the approaches and
policies of UCC Art. 9 and its suitability as a model for potential secured
transactions law reform in Ethiopia. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | St.Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Credit market, UCC, unitary concept/theory, functional approach, floating lien, floating charge, security interest, self-help repossession, efficiency | en_US |
dc.title | Vol. 11 No.1:Rethinking Ethiopian Secured Transactions Law through Comparative Perspective: Lessons from the Uniform Commercial Code of the US | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|