DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Kiros, Simeneh | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-11T06:29:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-11T06:29:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-09 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v11i1.4 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The criminal justice system is constituted of criminal norms, institutions and
methods, among others. Interpretation of the criminal law is a process that
transforms the text of the law into reality. The process is influenced by various
factors, such as, the courts’ conception of the criminal law, the concept and
practice of interpretation and how the interpreting institutions understand their
role. The understanding of the three elements evolved over the years. The
exegetic school, taking statutes as the sole source of the criminal law, argue for
using ‘strict’ methods of interpretation. However, the hermeneutic school holds
that interpretation is about the understanding of the law as well as finding the
law to the facts of a case, thus, they argue for doctrinal interpretation. The
various doctrines of the criminal law constituting meta-norms scaffold the
ordinary interpretative methods of the criminal norms. This article discusses the
methods in law, which constitute an essential part of the criminal justice
system. After a brief introduction of those elements of the ‘system’, it delves
into the structures, the criminal norms as objects of interpretation and their
relation to the meta-norms, guiding the interpretation process. It examines the
notion of interpretation relative to legislative drafting and augmenting
knowledge of the criminal law. Finally, as there are various factors that push
the court into the realm of formalism, it also argues for a manner of
interpretation, away from judicial formalism. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | St.Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Interpretation, rules, principles, meta-norms, criminal law, object of interpretation, judicial formalism, cassation division | en_US |
dc.title | Vol. 11 No.1:Methods and Manners of Interpretation of Criminal Norms | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|