Skip navigation
st. Mary's University Institutional Repository St. Mary's University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6523
Title: Vol. 10 No.2:The Normative Basis for Decision on the Merits in Commercial Arbitration: The Extent of Party Autonomy
Authors: Yohannes, Seyoum
Keywords: Commercial arbitration, party autonomy, principles of law, foreign law, rules of law, equity, mandate to settle, amiable composition, Ethiopia.
Issue Date: Dec-2016
Publisher: St.Mary's University
Abstract: This article examines the extent of party autonomy in determining the norms that apply to the substance of a commercial dispute in arbitration. Particularly, it analyses ‘principles of law,’ the normative basis for arbitration under Ethiopian law. The article further explores whether parties to arbitration are at liberty to mandate the application of foreign law, rules of law and equity. It also examines whether a ‘mandate to settle’ is enforceable under Ethiopian law. The article concludes that Ethiopian law allows maximum flexibility to parties as regards to the determination of norms applicable to the substance of a commercial dispute. The law can even be construed as recognising ‘mandate to settle’.
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v10i2.3
Appears in Collections:Mizan Law Review

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mizan LR_10(2)_Dec. 2016-83-107.pdf212.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.