DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Haileslassie, Zbelo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-10T13:01:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-10T13:01:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-09 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v10i1.6 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The use of water is a basic and universal human right while the right to use water
is one of the most contested rights. There are common problems and debates in
relation to setting the order of priority to promote equitable utilization aligned with
equitable allocation under water resources governance. This article examines
different literature, theories, laws and policies to search the standard tests. There
are priorities related to conflicting interests. Moreover, there are problems of
depletion, pollution, water grabbing, wastage of water, and water crisis that are
attributable to lack of comprehensive regulations, or confusions in putting policy
options. The regulatory tools lack clarity and sufficiency with regard to the
incorporation of standard tests. There is thus the need for a relatively exhaustive
order of priorities that embody human rights to water and other situational and
policy justifications. The justifications are expected to reinforce the reasonablebeneficial
use standard tests with due flexibility in re-ordering priorities where
they are incompatible. The technical application of the standard tests in ordering
priorities can control water grabbing and wastage of water. This requires policy
options that are helpful to avoid water grabbing and water wastage thereby
facilitating the attainment of the ‘highest social and economic benefits’. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | St.Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Water use, reasonable use, beneficial use, priority, Ethiopia, standard test, water grabbing, water wastage | en_US |
dc.title | Vol. 10 No.1:The Quest for Standard Tests in Prioritizing Water Use Rights in Ethiopia: Reasonable Use, Beneficial Use or ‘Beyond’ | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|