Keywords: | Livelihoods, living conditions, well-being, capabilities, state of being, development, new approaches, Ethiopia |
Abstract: | The civilized-uncivilized line of thinking had an element-system interface
whereby social conduct was the aggregate of individual moral standards and
behaviours. On the contrary, developmentalism tends to reverse this interface
and give prime attention to ‘economic growth’. This usually depersonalizes
individuals and at times relegates them to the oblivion of anonymity. In spite
of Ethiopia’s statistical claims of double-digit economic growth, there are
challenges in the implementation of the right of citizens to enhanced
livelihoods. I argue that new approaches should critically examine the most
effective means of enhancing the (physical, mental, spiritual and emotional)
being of citizens and their (economic, social, political and environmental)
living conditions. Development is not ‘given’ by a ‘Big Brother’, and is rather
the making of citizens themselves through a strong work culture in the context
of an appropriate institutional setting including policy environment. Nor should
development be regarded as hasty campaign because it is an incremental steady
march and attainment. The 1995 Ethiopian Constitution envisages the capacity
enhancement of citizens so that they can bring about development and meet
their needs. New approaches should thus give prime attention to nurturing and
developing the state of being and livelihoods of citizens in the context of
environmental sustainability and the preservation of positive cultural legacies.
Such approaches and conceptions should transcend statistical figures and
reports of ‘accelerated growth’ in construction, the number of universities, etc.,
and instead offer prime attention to the bigger picture of enhancing livelihoods
(including poverty alleviation) and the state of being (i.e., moral character,
quality education, social ties and work ethic) of citizens. |