DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | TEGEGNE, ALEMAYEHU | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-27T09:05:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-27T09:05:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-05 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1610 | - |
dc.description.abstract | There were repeated complaints from consumers about stock out and price increase on point
of use water treatment chemicals at retail outlets through mass media. The researcher
performed PUR outlet and household surveyin Bele Town, Wolayta Zone to evaluate the
complaints of customers in scientific ways. The researcher used descriptive and qualitative
research methods for both surveys. He used purposive sampling techniques for outlet survey
and simple random sampling technique for household survey. Twenty three retailers and one
hundred ninety four households were used as sample for this research. The data were
collected from these samples using questionnaires at face to face interview for both surveys
and additional observation for outlet survey. The collected and evaluated data were
analyzed using descriptive statistical tools for both surveys. The Outlet survey was measured
in terms of PUR and PUR Point of Sales Materials (POS) availability and visibility, PUR
selling price, availability of PUR expired stocks and the market share of PUR against other
point of use water treatment chemicals. The findings of the study showed that the complaints
of consumers through mass media were correct and only 8.7% retailers surveyed fulfilled all
the requirements of the indicators of outlet survey. The total achievement percentage for
each outlet survey indicator was different as indicated in the result section of the research.
In the household survey the researcher counter checked the information obtained in the
outlet survey in addition to assessed and analyzed the households’ behavior on household
water treatment and their knowledge on point of use household water treatment. The
household survey results showed that the behavior of households in treating their household
water was very good but there were some differences in the response of household survey to
the indicators used to assess the outlet survey. Based on the findings the researcher
recommended PSI/E to organize a workshop to give a theoretical and practical training to
all stakeholders on identified gaps. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | St. Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Qutlet Survey Methods | en_US |
dc.subject | Availability | en_US |
dc.subject | Visibility | en_US |
dc.subject | Market Share | en_US |
dc.subject | Price | en_US |
dc.subject | Expired Stock | en_US |
dc.subject | Household Survey and Behavior | en_US |
dc.subject | Business Administration | en_US |
dc.title | PUR (WATER PURIFIER) OUTLET AND HOUSEHOLD SURVEY AT BELE TOWN, WOLAYTA ZONE | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Business Administration
|