DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Lijalem, Endalew | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-24T08:28:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-24T08:28:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-06 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1360 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Upon acquisition of legal personality a company enjoys certain attributes such
as limited liability. While the separate legal personality of a company enables it
to enjoy rights and assume obligations quite different from its members, the
limited liability of shareholders refers to the fact that the company alone is
liable for its debts. However, such privilege of limited liability may not always
exist when the legal personality of a company is abused and used for
illegitimate or unlawful purposes and other reasons. This article examines some
of the grounds by which the corporate veil can be pierced under Ethiopian law
and the role of courts in recognizing the doctrine. Based on the analysis of the
relevant legislative provisions and some court cases, it is found that Ethiopian
company law, though not sufficient, provides some clear grounds of piercing
the corporate veil and certain possible grounds which may call for the
application of the doctrine. It is also argued that Ethiopian courts should apply
the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil, through the purposive interpretation
of the statutory provisions, if doing so produces equitable results and fairness. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | St. Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Company, corporate veil, piercing the veil, Ethiopia | en_US |
dc.title | Vol 6. No 1 THE DOCTRINE OF PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL: ITS LEGAL AND JUDICIAL RECOGNITION IN ETHIOPIA | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|