DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Stebek, Elias N. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-24T07:41:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-24T07:41:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011-03 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1270 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article, inter alia, attempts to highlight some major concepts and theories
on property and the rationales and elements of property rights. It also briefly
deals with the distinction between property rights on the stock of resources and
its flows, and indicates the downsides of open access in the efficient utilization
and sustainability of common-pool resources. Where de jure public property
becomes de facto open access, certain common-pool resources in the rural areas
of Ethiopia (such as forests) are exposed to encroachment, unlawful logging
and overgrazing. The article attempts to show that it is usually impossible to
effectively exclude persons from the use and overconsumption of commonpool
resources in Ethiopia in the absence of well-defined and effectively
implemented public property regime, or unless the property rights of
indigenous communities and collectives such as peasant associations are duly
recognized and clearly defined so that the right holders can have vested interest
in the preservation, protection and development of these resources. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | st. Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Property rights, rural open-access, common property, public property, common-pool resources, Ethiopia. | en_US |
dc.title | Vol 5. No 1 CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF PROPERTY RIGHTS: RETHINKING DE FACTO RURAL OPEN ACCESS TO COMMON-POOL RESOURCES IN ETHIOPIA | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|