Skip navigation
st. Mary's University Institutional Repository St. Mary's University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1264
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYaze, Worku-
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-24T07:37:54Z-
dc.date.available2016-06-24T07:37:54Z-
dc.date.issued2010-09-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1264-
dc.description.abstract‘Presumption’ is an ambiguous term that one often finds in substantive and procedural laws. The controversy regarding the operation and effect of ‘presumption’ in civil proceedings has not yet been conclusively resolved despite efforts of scholars. In Ethiopia, it has been subject to different judicial interpretations. The Cassation Division of the Federal Supreme Court has adopted a binding interpretation of Art 2024 of the Civil Code on the presumption of payment of debts. Yet, the propriety of this authoritative interpretation has become contentious. This Article examines the operations and effects of presumptions in civil actions in general and inquires into the propriety of the precedent adopted by the Cassation Division. It argues that the Division’s interpretation needs to be reconsidered when the issue arises in future cases.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSt. Mary's Universityen_US
dc.subjectPresumptions, kinds of presumption, rebuttable presumptions of law, operation of presumptions, effects of presumption, persuasive & evidential presumptions.en_US
dc.titleVol 4. No 2 OPERATION AND EFFECT OF PRESUMPTIONS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: AN INQUIRY INTO THE INTERPRETATION OF ART 2024 OF THE ETHIOPIAN CIVIL CODEen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Mizan Law Review

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
OPERATION AND EFFECT OF PRESUMPTIONS.pdf309.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.