DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Yaze, Worku | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-24T07:37:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-24T07:37:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-09 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1264 | - |
dc.description.abstract | ‘Presumption’ is an ambiguous term that one often finds in substantive and
procedural laws. The controversy regarding the operation and effect of
‘presumption’ in civil proceedings has not yet been conclusively resolved
despite efforts of scholars. In Ethiopia, it has been subject to different judicial
interpretations. The Cassation Division of the Federal Supreme Court has
adopted a binding interpretation of Art 2024 of the Civil Code on the
presumption of payment of debts. Yet, the propriety of this authoritative
interpretation has become contentious. This Article examines the operations
and effects of presumptions in civil actions in general and inquires into the
propriety of the precedent adopted by the Cassation Division. It argues that the Division’s interpretation needs to be reconsidered when the issue arises in future cases. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | St. Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Presumptions, kinds of presumption, rebuttable presumptions of law, operation
of presumptions, effects of presumption, persuasive & evidential presumptions. | en_US |
dc.title | Vol 4. No 2 OPERATION AND EFFECT OF PRESUMPTIONS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: AN INQUIRY INTO THE INTERPRETATION OF ART 2024 OF THE ETHIOPIAN CIVIL CODE | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|