DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Lencho, Taddese | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-24T07:27:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-24T07:27:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-03 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1256 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The revenue provisions of the Ethiopian Constitution are striking on a number
of levels. By and large, the revenue provisions do not evince conformity with
what the theories of fiscal federalism generally prescribe in the area of
assignment of revenue powers. In addition, the revenue provisions of the
Ethiopian Constitution are more detailed than their counterparts elsewhere.
And, the Ethiopian Constitution departs from the assignment formula set for
expenditure powers and prescribes a special procedure for assignment of
‘undesignated taxes’. These features of the Ethiopian Constitution raise a
number of questions and concerns. This article uses the income tax assignment
in the Ethiopian Constitution to highlight some of these questions and
concerns. There is ample evidence to show that the assignment formula adopted
by the Constitution, indeed its predecessor - the 1992 law - was motivated by
the desire to divide the power of taxation over existing taxes in Ethiopia rather
than to reinvent the wheel. However, there might be a tension between the
formula the Constitution adopts to assign tax powers and the prescriptions of the theories of fiscal federalism. The article explores the implications of this assignment. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | St. Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Income tax, Ethiopian Constitution, fiscal federalism, revenue assignment,global income tax, schedular income tax | en_US |
dc.title | Vol 4. No 1 INCOME TAX ASSIGNMENT UNDER THE ETHIOPIAN CONSTITUTION: ISSUES TO WORRY ABOUT | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|