<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2054">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2054</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2463" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2462" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2461" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2282" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-14T12:31:30Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2463">
    <title>A Comparative Analysis of Academic Staff’s Job Performance between Private and Public Universities in Tanzania</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2463</link>
    <description>Title: A Comparative Analysis of Academic Staff’s Job Performance between Private and Public Universities in Tanzania
Authors: Ngalomba, Simon Peter
Abstract: This study investigates the academic performance of the academic staff in Tanzania’s private&#xD;
and public universities in the areas of teaching and research activities. The study aims to prove&#xD;
that there are differences between the two types of universities. An independent-sample t-test&#xD;
approach was employed to measure those differences. The study revealed that there are&#xD;
statistically significant differences between the performance in the two types of universities in&#xD;
terms of the number of research projects, the number of academic publications in international level&#xD;
peer-reviewed journals, the number of presentations at international-level academic&#xD;
conferences and the number of academic books published. But with respect to the number of&#xD;
postgraduate students under academic supervision, the extent of teaching workloads, expressed&#xD;
in terms of subject units, the number of academic publications in national-level journals and the&#xD;
number of presentations at national-level conferences there are no significant differences.</description>
    <dc:date>2013-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2462">
    <title>A Comparative Analysis of Academic Staff’s Job Performance between Private and Public Universities in Tanzania</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2462</link>
    <description>Title: A Comparative Analysis of Academic Staff’s Job Performance between Private and Public Universities in Tanzania
Authors: Ngalomba, Simon Peter
Abstract: This study investigates the academic performance of the academic staff in Tanzania’s private&#xD;
and public universities in the areas of teaching and research activities. The study aims to prove&#xD;
that there are differences between the two types of universities. An independent-sample t-test&#xD;
approach was employed to measure those differences. The study revealed that there are&#xD;
statistically significant differences between the performance in the two types of universities in&#xD;
terms of the number of research projects, the number of academic publications in international level&#xD;
peer-reviewed journals, the number of presentations at international-level academic&#xD;
conferences and the number of academic books published. But with respect to the number of&#xD;
postgraduate students under academic supervision, the extent of teaching workloads, expressed&#xD;
in terms of subject units, the number of academic publications in national-level journals and the&#xD;
number of presentations at national-level conferences there are no significant differences.</description>
    <dc:date>2013-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2461">
    <title>A Comparative Analysis of Academic Staff’s Job Performance between Private and Public Universities in Tanzania</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2461</link>
    <description>Title: A Comparative Analysis of Academic Staff’s Job Performance between Private and Public Universities in Tanzania
Authors: Ngalomba, Simon Peter
Abstract: This study investigates the academic performance of the academic staff in Tanzania’s private&#xD;
and public universities in the areas of teaching and research activities. The study aims to prove&#xD;
that there are differences between the two types of universities. An independent-sample t-test&#xD;
approach was employed to measure those differences. The study revealed that there are&#xD;
statistically significant differences between the performance in the two types of universities in&#xD;
terms of the number of research projects, the number of academic publications in international level&#xD;
peer-reviewed journals, the number of presentations at international-level academic&#xD;
conferences and the number of academic books published. But with respect to the number of&#xD;
postgraduate students under academic supervision, the extent of teaching workloads, expressed&#xD;
in terms of subject units, the number of academic publications in national-level journals and the&#xD;
number of presentations at national-level conferences there are no significant differences.</description>
    <dc:date>2013-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2282">
    <title>Marketing of Electronic Information Resources (EIRs) in Private Higher Education Institutions (PHEIs) in Ethiopia</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2282</link>
    <description>Title: Marketing of Electronic Information Resources (EIRs) in Private Higher Education Institutions (PHEIs) in Ethiopia
Authors: Mammo, Wondimeneh (Asst. Prof.)
Abstract: This research was conducted to investigate the available marketing strategy in the light of&#xD;
increasing the awareness and uptake of Electronic Information Resources (EIRs) by users of&#xD;
PHEIs that are registered in Program for the Enhancement of Research Information (PERI). In&#xD;
an attempt to achieve the research objective, such research questions as “what marketing&#xD;
approaches are used by the libraries to promote the existence of EIRs in the institutions&#xD;
surveyed?”; “are there enabling infrastructures that assist the marketing of EIRs?”; “how do&#xD;
institutional libraries rate the level of support from the top management in their effort to market&#xD;
EIRs?”; “as part of marketing strategies, do institutions link up EIRS with courses in their&#xD;
graduate programs?” and “are there adequate human resource capacities to handle the&#xD;
marketing of EIRs?” were considered. The targeted institutions for the research were St. Mary’s&#xD;
University College (SMUC) and Alpha University College as they were PHEIs that are the only&#xD;
ones currently registered in PERI and delivering postgraduate program education. Survey&#xD;
research methodology was used and review of PERI system and publisher databases to map the&#xD;
contents against the graduates programs were made. Major findings of the study revealed that&#xD;
marketing using electronic communication, physical medium, human interaction and using&#xD;
training are practiced in the surveyed institutions, there is adequate infrastructure in SMUC to&#xD;
market EIRs, level of support from the top management towards marketing of EIRs is minimal in&#xD;
the surveyed institutions and the available human resource is adequate to handle marketing of&#xD;
EIRs generally. It was also concluded that there are positive developments in the marketing of&#xD;
EIRs in the surveyed institutions in the light of maintaining quality in graduate program and&#xD;
research endeavors. Based on the major findings, it was recommended that efforts must be made&#xD;
by PHEIs to integrate marketing of EIRS as part of collection development policy; as part of&#xD;
handling marketing using electronic communication, institutions must strengthen their effort and&#xD;
incorporate utilization of web 2.0; top management must be one of the prime champion in the&#xD;
institutional efforts to market EIRs to maintain quality in graduate program and research;&#xD;
existing effort in AUC in linking up EIRs and graduate programs must be strengthened and&#xD;
SMUC and other PHEIs must also follow suit and Capacity building schemes endeavors must be&#xD;
designed by such stakeholders as Consortium of PHEIs and Consortium of Academic and&#xD;
Research Libraries (CEARL) to enable librarians engage themselves in aggressive marketing of&#xD;
EIRs.</description>
    <dc:date>2013-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

